Darwinian evolution is only capable of producing variations on a pre-existing design; every variation it produces is a corruption of an original genetic code, even if it is beneficial for survival.
Gregory I. Lang , Amber M. Rice, Evolution unscathed: Darwin Devolves argues on weak reasoning that unguided evolution is a destructive force, incapable of innovation, Evolution, Volume 73, Issue 4, 1 April 2019, Pages 862–868, https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13710
Clark - I'll take a stab at that in my next piece! I read the review that Paul linked and found it unpersuasive. But I'll try to deal with it at more length in a piece I am working on now.
You should read the detailed scientific review of Behe's book. I do not believe his characterizations of the limits of the evolutionary process are correct. Citation found here: https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/73/4/862/6882029?login=false
Gregory I. Lang , Amber M. Rice, Evolution unscathed: Darwin Devolves argues on weak reasoning that unguided evolution is a destructive force, incapable of innovation, Evolution, Volume 73, Issue 4, 1 April 2019, Pages 862–868, https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13710
And what has been Behe's reply, along with the replies of others? After reading the back and forth, who is more convincing?
https://darwindevolves.com/criticism/
Clark - I'll take a stab at that in my next piece! I read the review that Paul linked and found it unpersuasive. But I'll try to deal with it at more length in a piece I am working on now.
Paul, thanks for linking the review!